<Past |
Future> |
1.3 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.3.1 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.3.2 |
Approved w/Constraints [1] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Divest [2] |
Divest [2] |
Divest [2] |
Divest [2] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [3] |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.4 |
Approved w/Constraints [1] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Divest [2] |
Divest [2] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Unapproved |
1.5 |
Approved w/Constraints [1] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Divest [2] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
2.1 |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
2.2 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
2.3 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
2.4 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Approved w/Constraints [2] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [3] |
Divest [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Divest [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
2.5 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [3] |
Approved w/Constraints [3] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
2.7 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 3, 5, 6, 7] |
2.10 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
3.2 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
3.3 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
3.4 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
3.5 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
3.6 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
3.7 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
4.0 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
4.7 |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
| | [1] | Technology must remain patched and operated in accordance with Federal and Department security policies and guidelines in order to mitigate known and future security vulnerabilities. | | [2] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [3] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [4] | OTC uses the Java Runtime Environment (JRE). It is recommended that the latest release of Java 8, 32-bit be maintained at all times to ensure the highest level of security.
It is a requirement that VA sensitive data be properly protected in accordance with VA Handbook 6500, Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), and Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2.
In accordance with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SP 800-53 and SP 800-70, Information Security is an important business process that should be considered in all phases of the acquisition process to ensure data and information technology (IT) systems are adequately protected against risk of loss, misuse, and unauthorized access.
In accordance with FISMA, government information or government IT systems require compliance with the agency IT Security Policy. All information technology acquisitions must meet the requirements outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 39.101 (d) policy ensuring the use of common security configuration checklists in the management of risk. | | [5] | In cases where the technology is used for external connections, a full Enterprise Security Change Control Board (ESCCB) review is required in accordance VA Directive 6004 , VA Directive 6517, and VA Directive 6513. The local ISO can advise on the ESCCB review process. | | [6] | This technology should only be used when required by a Veterans Affairs (VA) business partner for an approved VA Project. Use of this technology must comply with ESCCB requirements which include: Signed Interconnection Agreements/Memorandum of Understanding agreements (MOU/ISA) with each external business partner, compliance with VA Handbook 6500, and must implement appropriate National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) requirements for all devices interacting with this technology. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. As of January 27th, 2017, Risk-based Decisions (RBD) will be handled per VAIQ # 7769667. In cases where the technology is used for external connections, a full Enterprise Security Change Control Board (ESCCB) review is required in accordance VA Directive 6004, VA Directive 6517
and VA Directive 6513. The local ISO can advise on the ESCCB review process and ensure privacy of information compliance protections are in place. | | [7] | OTC uses the Java Runtime Environment (JRE). It is recommended that the latest release of Java 8, 32-bit be maintained at all times to ensure the highest level of security.
It is a requirement that VA sensitive data be properly protected in accordance with VA Handbook 6500, Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), and Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2.
In accordance with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SP 800-53 and SP 800-70, Information Security is an important business process that should be considered in all phases of the acquisition process to ensure data and information technology (IT) systems are adequately protected against risk of loss, misuse, and unauthorized access.
In accordance with FISMA, government information or government IT systems require compliance with the agency IT Security Policy. All information technology acquisitions must meet the requirements outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 39.101 (d) policy ensuring the use of common security configuration checklists in the management of risk. |
|
Note: |
At the time of writing, version 4.7 is the most current version and released 10/05/2023. |