<Past |
Future> |
3.1.x |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 2] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 2] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 2] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 5] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 5] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 5] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
3.2.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
4.0.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] |
4.1.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
4.2.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
4.3.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
| | [1] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [2] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [3] | This product can be configured with Microsoft Access, which currently has TRM constraints for VA sensitive data. If Microsoft Access is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered. (Refer to Microsoft Access TRM entry for more details) | | [4] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [5] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [6] | This product can be configured with Microsoft Access, which currently has TRM constraints for VA sensitive data and internet usage. If Microsoft Access is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered. (Refer to Microsoft Access TRM entry for more details.) | | [7] | Technology must remain patched and operated in accordance with Federal and Department security policies and guidelines in order to mitigate known and future security vulnerabilities. | | [8] | New installations or major expansions of this technology that transmit data over the VA Wide Area Network (WAN) must complete a WAN impact review (contact VA e-mail: [OIT ITOPS SD Engagement Requests]) prior to implementation to ensure proper compliance to VA network design and usage requirements. |
|
Note: |
At the time of writing version 4.3.0.36 is the most recent version. |