<Past |
Future> |
1.24.x |
Divest [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.25.x |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Divest [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Divest [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Divest [4, 8, 10, 11] |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.26.x |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [3, 4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Divest [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Divest [4, 8, 10, 11] |
Divest [4, 8, 11, 12] |
Divest [4, 8, 11, 12] |
1.27.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 10, 11] |
Divest [4, 8, 11, 12] |
Divest [4, 8, 11, 12] |
1.28.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 7, 8, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 10, 11] |
Divest [4, 8, 11, 12] |
Divest [4, 8, 11, 12] |
1.29.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 10, 11] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 11, 12] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 11, 12] |
1.30.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 10, 11] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 11, 12] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 11, 12] |
1.31.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 11, 12] |
Approved w/Constraints [4, 8, 11, 12] |
1.32.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.33.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.34.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.38.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
1.39.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
| | [1] | Note: CIO decision on March 6, 2012 granted permission for Intranet use only. | | [2] | As of April 23, 2015, per the Deputy CIO of Architecture, Strategy and Design (ASD), all technologies in use by the VA require an assessment by the VA Section 508 office. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 is a federal law that sets the guidelines for technology accessibility. A VA Section 508 assessment of this technology has not been completed at the time of publication. Therefore, as of April 23, 2015 only users of this technology who have deployed the technology to the production environment, or have project design and implementation plans approved, may continue to operate this technology. In the case of a project that has implemented, or been approved for a specific site or number of users, and that project needs to expand operations to other sites or to an increased user base, it may do so as long as the project stays on the existing version of the technology that was approved or implemented as of April 22, 2015. Use of this technology in all other cases is prohibited.
| | [3] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [4] | Due to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) identified security vulnerabilities, extra vigilance should be applied to ensure the versions remain properly patched to mitigate known and future vulnerabilities. The local ISO can provide assistance in reviewing the NIST vulnerabilities. | | [5] | Technology must remain patched and operated in accordance with Federal and Department security policies and guidelines in order to mitigate known and future security vulnerabilities. | | [6] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [7] | CIO decision on March 6, 2012 granted permission for Intranet use only. This product can also be configured with a MySQL Database which currently has TRM constraints for intranet use only due to its many known security issues. If MySQL is selected for use with this product, these factors should be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High Risk system. See the MySQL Database TRM entry for more details. | | [8] | Users should check with their supervisor, Information Security Office (ISO) or local OIT representative for permission to download and use this software. Downloaded software must always be scanned for viruses prior to installation to prevent adware or malware. Freeware may only be downloaded directly from the primary site that the creator of the software has advertised for public download and user or development community engagement. Users should note, any attempt by the installation process to install any additional, unrelated software is not approved and the user should take the proper steps to decline those installations. | | [9] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [10] | This product can be configured with a MySQL Database which currently has TRM constraints for intranet use only due to its many known security issues. If MySQL is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High Risk system. See the MySQL Database TRM entry for more details.
The following constraints must be adhered to in accordance with an Initial Product Review (IPR) conducted on this technology:
- MediaWiki should not be used to collect, store and process VA sensitive information. System owners should reach out to Architecture, Strategy, and Design (ASD) under the Office of Information & Technology (OI&T) and ask for guidance for deploying an enterprise-wide collaborative web content development platform.
- System owners must ensure they deploy or upgrade to the latest version of the software. The system should be deployed on a dedicated server within a protected enclave where strict access controls are in place to allow access only to authorized team members. In addition, system owners should follow the security guidance issued by MediaWiki.
- System owners need to stay informed of the MediaWiki development activities to ensure software updates and patches to the software are tested and installed in a timely manner. Additionally, system owners need to constantly monitor the various resources within the MediaWiki community to get the most up-to-date information on known vulnerabilities as well as solutions to mitigate or remediate the vulnerabilities.
| | [11] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [12] | This product can be configured with a MySQL Database which currently has TRM constraints for intranet use only due to its many known security issues. If MySQL is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High Risk system. See the MySQL Database TRM entry for more details.
The following constraints must be adhered to in accordance with an Initial Product Review (IPR) conducted on this technology:
- MediaWiki should not be used to collect, store and process VA sensitive information. System owners should reach out to Architecture, Strategy, and Design (ASD) under the Office of Information & Technology (OI&T) and ask for guidance for deploying an enterprise-wide collaborative web content development platform.
- System owners must ensure they deploy or upgrade to the latest version of the software. The system should be deployed on a dedicated server within a protected enclave where strict access controls are in place to allow access only to authorized team members. In addition, system owners should follow the security guidance issued by MediaWiki.
- System owners need to stay informed of the MediaWiki development activities to ensure software updates and patches to the software are tested and installed in a timely manner. Additionally, system owners need to constantly monitor the various resources within the MediaWiki community to get the most up-to-date information on known vulnerabilities as well as solutions to mitigate or remediate the vulnerabilities.
|
|
Note: |
At the time of writing, version 1.39.3 is the most current version. |