<Past |
Future> |
2.x (AtHocGov - Mac) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
6.1.x (Platform) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
6.2.x (AtHocGov) |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 6, 7, 8] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 7, 8, 9] |
Divest [5, 9, 10, 11, 12] |
Divest [5, 9, 10, 11, 12] |
Divest [5, 9, 10, 11, 12] |
Divest [5, 9, 11, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
7.4.x (Platform) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 10, 11, 12] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 10, 11, 12] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 10, 11, 12] |
Divest [5, 9, 11, 13] |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Divest [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
7.6.x (Platform) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 11, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
Approved w/Constraints [5, 9, 12, 14, 15] |
7.7.x (Platform) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
7.12.x (Platform) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
7.4.x (AtHocGov) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
7.15.x (Platform) |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
| | [1] | Known security vulnerabilities must be properly remediated prior to product deployment. Product must remain properly patched per Federal and Department standards in order to mitigate known and future security vulnerabilities.
This technology should not be used to communicate any VA Sensitive information without a full evaluation of the technology for such use. Precautionary steps and procedures should be put in place to prevent accidental transmission of sensitive data.
Finally, new installations or major expansions of this technology must complete a Systems Engineering Design Review (SEDR) prior to implementation. | | [2] | As of April 23, 2015, per the Deputy CIO of Architecture, Strategy and Design (ASD), all technologies in use by the VA require an assessment by the VA Section 508 office. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 is a federal law that sets the guidelines for technology accessibility. A VA Section 508 assessment of this technology has not been completed at the time of publication. Therefore, as of April 23, 2015 only users of this technology who have deployed the technology to the production environment, or have project design and implementation plans approved, may continue to operate this technology. In the case of a project that has implemented, or been approved for a specific site or number of users, and that project needs to expand operations to other sites or to an increased user base, it may do so as long as the project stays on the existing version of the technology that was approved or implemented as of April 22, 2015. Use of this technology in all other cases is prohibited.
| | [3] | This technology should not be used to communicate any VA Sensitive information without a full evaluation of the technology for such use. Precautionary steps and procedures should be put in place to prevent accidental transmission of sensitive data.
Finally, new installations or major expansions of this technology must complete a Systems Engineering Design Review (SEDR) prior to implementation. | | [4] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [5] | Due to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) identified security vulnerabilities, extra vigilance should be applied to ensure the versions remain properly patched to mitigate known and future vulnerabilities. The local ISO can provide assistance in reviewing the NIST vulnerabilities. | | [6] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [7] | This technology should not be used to communicate any VA Sensitive information without a full evaluation of the technology for such use. Precautionary steps and procedures should be put in place to prevent accidental transmission of sensitive data.
Finally, new installations or major expansions of this technology must complete a Systems Engineering Design Review (SEDR) prior to implementation. | | [8] | In cases where the technology is used for external connections, a full Enterprise Security Change Control Board (ESCCB) review is required in accordance VA Directive 6004 , VA Directive 6517, and VA Directive 6513. The local ISO can advise on the ESCCB review process. | | [9] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [10] | This technology should not be used to communicate any VA Sensitive information without a full evaluation of the technology for such use. Precautionary steps and procedures should be put in place to prevent accidental transmission of sensitive data.
Finally, new installations or major expansions of this technology must complete a ITOPS Solution Delivery (SD) (contact VA e-mail: OIT ITOPS SD Engagement Requests) prior to implementation. | | [11] | This technology should only be used when required by a Veterans Affairs (VA) business partner for an approved VA Project. Use of this technology must comply with ESCCB requirements which include: Signed Interconnection Agreements/Memorandum of Understanding agreements (MOU/ISA) with each external business partner, compliance with VA Handbook 6500, and must implement appropriate National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) requirements for all devices interacting with this technology. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. As of January 27th, 2017, Risk-based Decisions (RBD) will be handled per VAIQ # 7769667. In cases where the technology is used for external connections, a full Enterprise Security Change Control Board (ESCCB) review is required in accordance VA Directive 6004, VA Directive 6517
and VA Directive 6513. The local ISO can advise on the ESCCB review process and ensure privacy of information compliance protections are in place. | | [12] | In cases where the technology is used for external connections, a full Enterprise Security Change Control Board (ESCCB) review is required in accordance VA Directive 6004 , VA Directive 6517, and VA Directive 6513. The local ISO can advise on the ESCCB review process. | | [13] | This technology should not be used to communicate any VA Sensitive information without a full evaluation of the technology for such use. Precautionary steps and procedures should be put in place to prevent accidental transmission of sensitive data.
Finally, new installations or major expansions of this technology must complete a ITOPS Solution Delivery (SD) (contact VA e-mail: OIT ITOPS SD Engagement Requests) prior to implementation. | | [14] | Due to potential information security risks, cloud based technologies may not be used without the approval of the Enterprise Cloud Solution Office (ECSO). This body is in part responsible for ensuring organizational information, Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected Health Information (PHI), and VA sensitive data are not compromised. (Ref: VA Directive 6004, VA Directive 6517, VA Directive 6513 and VA Directive 6102). | | [15] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). |
|
Note: |
At the time of writing, version 7.15 (Platform) is the most current version, released 09/01/2022. Version 7.4 (AtHocGov) is the most current version, released 12/01/2022. Version 2.5 (AtHocGov-Mac) is the most current version, released 10/01/2022. |