<Past |
Future> |
6.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
7.x |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Divest [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] |
8.x |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Divest [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
9.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Divest [1, 4, 6, 7, 9] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 10, 11, 12, 13] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] |
Approved w/Constraints [1, 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] |
10.x |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
Unapproved |
| | [1] | Due to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) identified security vulnerabilities, extra vigilance should be applied to ensure the versions remain properly patched to mitigate known and future vulnerabilities. The local ISO can provide assistance in reviewing the NIST vulnerabilities. | | [2] | As of April 23, 2015, per the Deputy CIO of Architecture, Strategy and Design (ASD), all technologies in use by the VA require an assessment by the VA Section 508 office. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 is a federal law that sets the guidelines for technology accessibility. A VA Section 508 assessment of this technology has not been completed at the time of publication. Therefore, as of April 23, 2015 only users of this technology who have deployed the technology to the production environment, or have project design and implementation plans approved, may continue to operate this technology. In the case of a project that has implemented, or been approved for a specific site or number of users, and that project needs to expand operations to other sites or to an increased user base, it may do so as long as the project stays on the existing version of the technology that was approved or implemented as of April 22, 2015. Use of this technology in all other cases is prohibited.
| | [3] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [4] | Users should check with their supervisor, Information Security Office (ISO) or local OIT representative for permission to download and use this software. Downloaded software must always be scanned for viruses prior to installation to prevent adware or malware. Freeware may only be downloaded directly from the primary site that the creator of the software has advertised for public download and user or development community engagement. Users should note, any attempt by the installation process to install any additional, unrelated software is not approved and the user should take the proper steps to decline those installations. | | [5] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [6] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [7] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [8] | This product can be configured with a MySQL Database which currently has TRM constraints for intranet use only due to its many known security issues. If MySQL is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High Risk system. See the MySQL Database TRM entry for more details.
Drupal and its subsequent modules can be configured with different databases. The user must only use TRM-approved databases. | | [9] | This product can be configured with a MySQL Database which currently has TRM constraints for intranet use only due to its many known security issues. If MySQL is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High-Risk system. See the MySQL Database TRM entry for more details.
Drupal and its subsequent modules can be configured with different databases. The user must only use TRM-approved databases. | | [10] | This product can be configured with a MySQL Database which currently has TRM constraints limiting its use to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) only and intranet use only due to its many known security issues. If MySQL is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High-Risk system. See the MySQL Database TRM entry for more details.
Drupal and its subsequent modules can be configured with different databases. The user must only use TRM-approved databases.
Users must ensure that Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) and PostgreSQL are implemented within VA-approved baselines. | | [11] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISO (Information Security Officer) to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500. | | [12] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 compliant encryption to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the hard drive where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information Security Officer (ISO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). | | [13] | This product can be configured with a PostgreSQL Database, which currently has TRM constraints limiting its use to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) only due to its many known security issues on other platforms. If PostgreSQL is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High-Risk system. See PostgreSQL Database TRM entry for more details. | | [14] | Users must ensure that Google Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Structured Query Language (SQL) Server, Oracle Database, and MongoDB Enterprise Advanced are implemented with VA-approved baselines. (refer to the ‘Category’ tab under ‘Runtime Dependencies’)
Users must not utilize the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol, as it is unapproved for use on the TRM.
Users must not utilize the Maria Database (DB) Server or Opera Desktop technologies, as they are unapproved for use on the TRM. | | [15] | If this product uses a MySQL database, the product must be configured with a commercial edition of the MySQL Database, which currently has TRM constraints limiting its use for intranet and non-sensitive data only due to its many known security issues. If a commercial edition of MySQL is selected for use with this product, these factors must be considered especially when an instance of this product will be considered a Moderate or High-Risk system. See MySQL Database – Commercial Edition TRM entry for more details. | | [16] | This technology has received one or more VA security bulletins that provide specific guidance on vulnerability patching and mitigation. It is the responsibility of VA system owners to ensure that the appropriate mitigations are taken to address all known and future discovered vulnerabilities with this product. See the Reference tab for more information on security bulletins related to this product. |
|
Note: |
At the time of writing, version 10.0.0 is the most current version, released 12/15/2022. |